Saturday, June 25, 2022

Morality

Yesterday's decision is not a moral win. 

Yesterday's decision is not a victory for people who want to follow Jesus. 

Yesterday's decision was not made yesterday for the people who chose to make it. It wasn't made in this century. 

I am going to let you in on a secret. You in the back, lean in closer, because you probably need to hear this. 

YOU

CANNOT

LEGISLATE 

MORALITY. 

THIS MEANS YOU. 

This is about RIGHTS. NOT morality. 

If you believe that you can force someone to do the thing that in YOUR head is the "right" thing, then I will tell you something that Clara J. Guyle, my beloved grandmother, said frequently to my mother: 

A mind changed against its will is of the same opinion still. 

You are not going to change someone's mind about what "right" is. 


If you are angry with me for making this statement, I have one you likely will agree with here: 

YOU

CANNOT

LEGISLATE

GENEROSITY.

THIS MEANS YOU. 

This is about FREE WILL, NOT generosity.

If you believe that you can force someone to do the thing that in YOUR head is the "equitable" thing, then I will tell you something that Clara J. Guyle, my beloved grandmother, said frequently to my mother: 

A mind changed against its will is of the same opinion still. 

You are not going to change someone's mind about what "equitable" is. 


If you want morality--really want it, can taste it--then act in a way that shows integrity. 

AT. ALL. TIMES. 

You cannot ask anyone else to abide by your integrity. However, you can lead by example. And, by the way, if you really want this?

Teach your children its importance, and make sure they see you be as upright as you wish the world to be. 


If you want generosity--truly believe it is transformative--then act in a way that is ethical.  

AT. ALL. TIMES. 

You cannot ask anyone else to stand by your ethics. However, you can lead by example. And, by the way, if you really want this?

Teach your children its importance, and make sure they see you be as generous and as ethical as you wish the world to be. 


Because guess what?

If we can stand as ethical (not moral) and with integrity (let your yes be yes and your no be no), we can lead ourselves to a way that is....

JUST.

They call it the Justice Department for a reason, folks. Because that's what legislation is for: justice. 

Rights and Free Will are also about justice. Justice is to serve them. 


What happened yesterday was not just, nor was it justice. 



Saturday, September 11, 2021

The Matrix Resurrections

I honestly can't tell if I'm really smart or really stupid about The Matrix Resurrections. The trailer dropped Thursday and I've seen it at least 10 times by now. I'm surprised that I have figured things out so easily (which means I'm probably dead wrong) but there are a lot of things to cover, so I'm going to just dive right in. 

1. Why are some characters being played by the original actors but not others?

There's a two-fold answer to this one that makes a lot of sense. One has to do with time, and the other has to do with the world that The Matrix built initially. In the actual world, both Laurence Fishburne and Hugo Weaving are now 60. They also had a hard time getting into Wu Ping shape to start with--I mean, they did it, but I think injuries would make either one a poor choice to reintegrate into this world. Meanwhile, Keanu has been doing more action-oriented things than the others, keeping in Wu Ping shape, honestly, by working continuously with Chad Stahelski for the last 7 years. In other words: Keanu's still in fighting shape and Fishburne and Weaving probably aren't. 

The second part has to do with the world that's been set up by the Wachowskis. In the first movie, we're shown the fields where "babies are not born, they are grown". This assumes that: the machines have a lot of genetic material to deal with, and it would make a lot of sense to use the same material over and over if it produces good crops, like using the best seeds. There's no reason they haven't found a way to replicate it. 

In other words: everyone in the Matrix probably has several clones at various stages of development. The way to make sure they don't run into each other is to spread them out within the Matrix itself. 

They've all been there before

If this is true, then the previous versions of the One may in fact have been versions of Neo--not just other people with the code, but that actual DNA. He's been suitably designed for this because the program required his existence, and he was chosen. Why not recycle to make things easier? Waste not, want not. 

(For those of you who question why the previous versions of Neo were more focused on humanity as a whole to save as opposed to being more attached specifically to Trinity, perhaps Trinity and Neo were never in proximity before, or maybe the Architect killed her early in the other iterations to ensure that the One would reboot the system properly.) 

Yahya Abdul-Mateen II was chosen as a younger version of Morpheus, and it's pretty good casting. Jonathan Groff is almost certainly playing an upgraded, rebooted, reintegrated Agent Smith. 

2. Sati, Oracle, or Yes?

We have quite a number of new faces that are portrayed by women, so I have to ask the question: does the Oracle have a new face (almost certainly), and where is Sati? For those of you who don't remember, she was the child in The Matrix Revolutions that was created by two other programs. She was also able to control aspects of the Matrix and was a favorite of the Oracle. Many are assuming that Priyanka Chopra-Jonas is playing the Oracle...but I wonder if she's playing Sati. Or have Sati and the Oracle integrated into one program?

3. Memory is a tricky thing

If I'm right about the Neos being clones, this begs the question: why does this Neo appear to be more powerful than previous iteration? I posit that, just as interacting with the extra code by Neo going "inside" Agent Smith at the end of the original movie gave Agent Smith expanded abilities, "our" Neo's ability to trod the untaken path unwittingly changed the code that is somehow embedded inside him, and when this code gets attached to the newer version, it has some (or all) of that Neo's knowledge embedded inside the code. All this version has to do is unlock the memories. 

4. When are we?

This question would answer a lot of the others that are bandied about the Internet at the moment, such as "What about the truce that Neo's death brokered?" We don't know how long it's been--it's possible that it is the same time differential that it's been for us (22 years since the original). It could be 150 years. We don't know. I believe that Neo's existence is essential for the programs to operate properly...something the Architect didn't count on. 

5. Niobe 

This is the biggest question I have: where's Jada? We didn't see her in the trailer. 


I'm sure it's going to be terrific. I remember the scuttlebutt about why the latter two-thirds of the original trilogy was not as good as the first (original, still the best, and still my favorite movie of all time), and I remember hearing that originally, the Wachowskis had written the trilogy...and The Matrix was the second movie in it. So they had to drag out the material in the third into two very long parts. 

I can only hope that this is as good as we need it to be in this crazy time. Lana, girl, come through for us. 















Sunday, June 6, 2021

The High Hiler Holy Day

Today is the High Hiler Holy Day. It is Memorial Day Sunday. 

It is the first Memorial Day Sunday that I have lived without my father. 

This. SUCKS. 

For those of you who don't know, the High Hiler Holy Day is so named because it is the annual running of the Indianapolis 500. I normally did not go to church on the High Hiler Holy Day. No, this is a day of deep celebration of my father's passion, open-wheel auto racing. 

In the good old days (read: the 80s), when they started airing it on television live instead of the time delay, this was the day that nobody had a diet. Our standard foods were: Terrell's Potato Chips, Terrell's Pretzel Sticks (the thin ones), Heluva Good French Onion Dip, cold cuts, cheese. There were variants, but that was the basic menu. 

There was also the obligatory nap. 

In the days B.P. (Before Prozac), this was one of two days a year that I could count on hearing "I love you, Kathryn" from my father. (The other was either Christmas or my birthday, which are 8 days apart. If I didn't hear it on the first one, I'd hear it on the second and vice-versa). My father, who didn't cry, would always choke up at Mary Hulman tottering out to say, "Gentlemen, start your engines." It was his "I coulda been a contender" moment. My father loved auto racing, and he was passionate about open-wheel specifically. He got very angry with the CART split, with USAC pushing the owners to create CART in the first place, about the mismanagement he saw even as Tony George (Chairman of the Board for the Speedway, grandson of Tony Hulman, the man who put the Indy 500 on the map) brought NASCAR to the Brickyard. 

Well, today would have been a helluva day for my father. 

I turned on the pre-race festivities, because of course I did. I hate that we don't have Jim Nabors singing "Back Home Again in Indiana". There are days that I think we should just have him on recording in perpetuity. I do not know the classical tenor who sang it today. It was absolutely note-perfect. Tone was gorgeous. And it doesn't measure up to memory. 

Then, the NBC (also, NBC!?! Apparently Disney sold away the rights and NBCUni/Comcast grabbed them) announcer team said, "And now, for the most famous words in auto racing...Roger Penske."

WHAT?!?!?!?!?!?!?

Some background here. Roger Penske (a billionaire) is a team owner who runs normally three drivers in the IndyCar series yearly. He also runs a three-car team over in NASCAR. He was once a respected driver, but was more slick than gritty, in Dad's words. He never raced the Indy500 (proof, my father would say, that he wasn't truly a great driver). He also apparently bought the Indianapolis Motor Speedway from the Hulman-George family 18 months ago. We just didn't know because of the postponement of the race last year due to Covid. 

My father hated Roger Penske. I mean, deeeeeeeeeeeeeep loathing. He respected Penske, in particular his business acumen, but he hated the fact that Penske made racing far more about who had the best equipment. My father believed that, essentially, the cars should be an even playing field and the sport should be about the best driver. While it's true that the best drivers can take middling equipment and win (Hello, Michael Schumacher. Hello, Ayrton Senna.), that axiom has held less since our technological age melded with computers...you know, what my father did for a living

My father hated that Rick Mears and Al Unser (Sr.) both won their fourth Indy 500s driving for Penske, and is probably arguing with someone right now about the fact that A.J. Foyt will forever remain the best driver this country has ever produced. Foyt won with inferior equipment all the time until Penske began changing the name of the game. But even Foyt couldn't compete with what Penske can afford in this day and age. 

In order to compete with Penske in truly inferior equipment, you would have to be one of the two Great Ones of Open-Wheel Auto Racing (modern era), greeted above. I'm still praying for Schumi. 

So to see Roger Penske, kind of my father's personal Antichrist of Auto Racing, saying the words that brought my father to tears in the BP days? Yeah, that kind of blew my mind. 

The race itself? It was a fairly good race. It was a very safe race. And it resulted in another man getting into that inner circle of four-time winners. My father would have liked to see Helio Castroneves win his fourth Indy 500 not driving for Penske, as he had for his first three. 

But I watched it solo. 

I will probably watch the Indy 500 for the remainder of my days, and miss my father poignantly on those Memorial Day Sundays. 

I love you too, Dad. 







Thursday, February 18, 2021

Why You Should Watch Babylon 5

I'm not going to belabor this. 

Those of you reading this, some of you may not like Science Fiction and you may not like the effects. At this moment I really don't care. Because in another rewatch of Babylon 5, I am bowled over by how prescient this little show that could was. To be honest, you don't even need to watch past Season 3 (although given how Season 3 ends, I'm pretty sure you're going to if you've invested at that point). 

It's as good a reflection of the problems facing America today as anything I've seen, and it was written more than 25 years ago. 

Yes, it's a slow start. Yes, Michael O'Hare sometimes comes across as wooden. Yes, Bruce Boxleitner might as well have "I am a Boy Scout" stenciled on his forehead. But the overarching storyline is terrifying in just how accurately J. Michael Straczynski (hereafter JMS) portrayed the human condition and how fear can twist us. 

Before you launch into a "your fave is problematic" diatribe...I know that JMS is problematic. Hell, he knows he's problematic. That does nothing to negate the fact that this work of his is the best thing he'll ever do and contains a story that does what Shakespeare did: highlight who we are as people. 

Warts and all. Maybe especially the warts. 

We can all sit around and hope for Gene Roddenberry's vision a better future (for those of you who don't know, Roddenberry=Mr. Star Trek) where we follow the better angels of our nature, but for the pragmatists among us, Straczynski has you covered. "The road to hell is paved with good intentions" might also be one of JMS' mottos. 

I can pontificate about this for a long, long time. But I'll just say this: it's on HBO Max, and it's worth your time. 

PS: RIP Mira Furlan, a better actress than we deserved, and a life needlessly shortened by a disease we should have found a way to cure by now (West Nile Virus). 

Saturday, November 7, 2020

Come Together

So, today is November 7, 2020, and it appears that Joe Biden has won the election that will make him President of the United States on 1/20/2021. 

Yes, I'm aware that there will be lawsuits and recounts and all of this. I think one thing Americans have to consider is that certain dedicated Intelligence Bureaus (FBI) and Military Forces (think Cybercom) have been monitoring this election and its legality far more closely than they watched 2016. 

Nobody wants there to be cause for questioning who our President is. 

There has been too much of that already, going back to 1960, when Nixon won the popular vote, and then 2000, when it was craziness, and 2016, when there may or may not have been election tampering (voting, no; misinforming Americans, yes). 

So while I might not believe all media in all things...I do believe that the FBI and the military have been working for the American people. 

I will remind those of you reading that I was raised in a staunchly Republican house with ideas about personal liberty...and personal responsibility, the flip side of that coin (at least in the Hiler household). Those ideas came with some virtues attached, and I was raised by my mother. A more virtuous human you may never find. So I'm pretty comfortable saying I understand what they are. 

And I am going to exhort everyone--EVERYONE--to start using those virtues today. 

Civility. Respect. Remaining calm. Choosing decency. 

These were things I've had to do in the past when my candidate didn't win. I didn't particularly like Bill Clinton in one of the elections he was in for personal reasons. And I learned a lot about respect from Mr. Clinton. One of the things about it is that you do not have to agree with everything a person does to respect at least something that person does. I wouldn't have trusted him alone with my mother, for crying out loud, but I would have absolutely trusted him to make good judgments about free trade on the American continent. 

From President Clinton, I learned what it means to respect the Office of the President and the person within it. I truly believe that, as far as the job is concerned, Bill Clinton made a good effort to do the job well for the American people. His personal life? Oh, he managed to mess that up good and proper during his tenure. But I must tell you that as an American, I'd rather he didn't screw the country over. He didn't. 

My father told me back in September the following: "I can't believe I've got to pull the lever for Biden". When I asked what changed (he voted for Trump in 2016), he said, "Trump's gone completely nuts. And I don't think he has a shred of human decency left in him." 

Let me tell you: when my father is talking about basic human decency as being a reason not to vote for a guy? Mr. Shoot-First-and-Ask-Questions-Later? That's a good time to reconsider why you support this dude. 

I know some of the reasons why some people support Republicanism. For instance, the idea that...no, really...we should have a smaller Federal Government and a larger State Government. You know, the actual ideal of Republicanism?!?!?  Back before it was conflated with Conservatism, which is not the same thing. Back when personal liberty meant that Republicans were supporting African-Americans in their rights? Go and look. I'll wait. Yes, freaking really, they voted more for civil rights in the 1950s than Democrats

Now, Republican v. Democrat has no ring for me whatsoever. Because one party appears to have the monopoly on promising personal liberty, while the other party appears to be actually helping people achieve personal liberty. 

And these parties are no longer a functional look at who we are as a people. 

Schwarzenegger recently put up a video in which he stated that he believes the government should not guarantee outcomes for all lives of all people. Honestly, that's what communism promised and could never achieve due to human nature. But Arnold also said government can guarantee that we start from the same place--such as the right to a decent education. That's a way to help everyone achieve personal liberty. And that is also something that I think speaks to basic human decency, helping everyone start at the same place. 

My mother would have loved him for that. 

Look. The world is a mixed-up place. I am having a very difficult time navigating it right now because I'm in mourning. There is no other way to describe it other than to say: I'm sad a lot and yes, I'm sure my antidepressants are working. 

Whomever you voted for in 2016 or 2020, whomever you voted to be chief dogcatcher of the Hamlet of Arthur in Oswego County, I am going to call on you now to show your basic human decency to each other. It's not about your guy. Neither candidate should ever have been a cult of personality, and quite frankly neither party should have become one, either. 

We need to come together as Americans. President-Elect Biden is planning a bipartisan cabinet. Scoff all you want, but this guy wants people to work together. He's choosing the person, not the party. 

Maybe we should, too. 






Thursday, October 8, 2020

371 Days

The last 371 days managed to take the three beings I loved the most on this planet from me. On September 30, 2019, I lost my beloved Axel Puppy. On December 11, 2019, my favorite person ever, my Mom, passed peacefully from this life. On October 4, 2020, my Dad died, surrounded by family. And with him died a whole lot of me. 

It has been one HELL of a year. 

I'm tired. I'm tired of fighting. I'm tired of partisanship. I'm tired of crying. 

It's a lot. 

I mean, I now have things I didn't have on Saturday. A lot of things. But they...are things. I would give them all back to laugh with my Dad, hug my Mom, pet my boy. But that's not how life works. I understand that now. 

I know the cost of things now. 

And I know that I will be okay. I mean, I'm not right now, and I'm not going to be for a long, long time. I'm not over the first loss I incurred in the last year plus five days, let alone the second. This one just sort of puts it all together into a nasty package for me. 

So if you're reading this, then you are a person whom I love. I'm going to beg your patience. I am going through a rough time right now. I'm an only child, and I feel very "only" in this world right now. Please understand: I am surrounded by the most wonderful people. I have a terrific team, and you all are so awesome. I don't deserve you, but I am very, very grateful for you. But I am the last of this little family that my parents built together. 

And I am not looking forward to a world without either of them in it. 


Friday, May 29, 2020

Why I am crying for George Floyd

My favorite way of self-describing is to say that I am a middle-aged white girl from Upstate New York. I say this, normally prefacing it with the words "I dance like...", because as any one of my kids from Nottingham can tell you, I really do dance like a white girl from Upstate.

I do not mean any of the words in a derogatory manner, quite honestly. I don't use the term "middle-aged" pejoratively; I am 50 years old, and based on genetics from the side of the family my body favors, I'm likely to live another 40-50 years, honestly. That makes me roughly at the midpoint of my life. I could say "middle-aged white fat girl from Upstate New York" and be accurate, also not using the term fat negatively but rather to describe the body I'm in.

I don't use the term white proudly. For me, it's a descriptor of the fact that I resemble the Swiss Miss girl. I could just as easily use really pale and be accurate. But in the common vernacular of the American culture is to call people white and black. (I genuinely would prefer terms that reflect reality: vanilla, chocolate, and cinnamon. Because white people have a culture, but it's pretty...vanilla.) I don't think that being this pale gives me superior genetics because I paid attention in biology class and understand that pretty much this body is the result of recessive everything. There's a reason that some features are dominant--they give some advantages, like not burning to an absolute crisp in sunshine.

As the days go on, however, I am uncomfortably aware of the privilege I have as a white woman. I'm part of the majority, although one that is going to be less of a majority in this country as time wears on. I don't feel like part of any majority, honestly, and I never have. I know what it's like to feel that the deck is stacked against you before you even set foot in a place. I have experienced this plenty in my life. I had years full of it.

I have spoken before about going to Nottingham and learning so much from the African-American teachers and Teaching Assistants we had in our program, not to mention my students. I learned more than I ever thought I could. And lately I've been thinking an awful lot about one student in particular we had in the 12:1 (3:1) program. I'm going to call him M.

M was the sweetest, most wonderful and loving kiddo you could meet. He was about 5'11" and 180 pounds. He was verbal and greeted everyone, every day, really loudly. M was the kid who rivaled me in volume. "GOOD MORNING MISS KATE!" he would say with that ENORMOUS smile on his face. Every morning, without fail. M hopefully has lost none of his enthusiasm for life in the intervening years. He was a joy to behold.

M has autism.

So while he understands a lot of what is said to him, sometimes M can get confused and needs things repeated. And M is black.

If M got separated from the people watching over him and began doing things that might seem odd to a passerby, I can easily see that someone might call the cops. This would scare M mightily. He very much might not understand exactly what is going on.

I shudder to think of how that could go. Because M might be a relatively big black man, but I'm pretty sure he's incapable of killing flies, let alone doing harm to anyone else. He is a sweet and loving soul and the thought that anyone could threaten him because he's different and he's black makes me cry to type it. My guess is that if this scenario were to ever occur, he would have identification on him that would indicate that he's in a group home and that would hopefully help the officers dispatched to help him. I pray to God that it would.

Granted: this scenario is unlikely because my M was a rule-follower and the odds that he would get separated from his humans is extremely unlikely. But the thought that he would be in more danger because he's black makes me livid.

Then I think of J. I didn't have J very long as a student in our program. J was scary. He killed animals just to see what it was like. Yes, that kind of kid. One who might get a pass because he's white. (He didn't get a pass from us, because one of the most honorable men I'll ever know, Lorenzo J. Jackson, held that kid's feet to the fire.)

Let me tell you: I am personally a lot more scared of J than I am of M. J was a bit skinny when I knew him, but tall. M surely outweighed him, but I am not at all afraid of M. Because my M, my beautiful sweet boy, just wanted to love you--and sing and dance in Drama class.

I'm not sure that J understands love. Which is a shame.

And yet, because one is black and one is white, people might be more afraid of the person who is no real threat and not fear the one who could do you harm.

I don't understand the world we live in. There are a lot of things I don't understand about it. But I do know this much: I hate that we seem to have a sorting system based upon the color of skin (especially if it's not the color of our own skin) that still has traction in this nation. I'll never know what it was like to live as a black woman, because I'm not one. I can only know my own struggles with my brain, and to think of having to be at such a disadvantage beyond that makes me marvel at the people I know who have survived it.

But I can know what it's like to love and to extend that love as much as I can. I'm still afraid of trying to show love, but that's not because of the color of someone's skin but because of my fear of vulnerability, something I am working on. But I can be vulnerable in this moment and say that I weep for George Floyd, for his family, and for those I know who have to struggle against this every day.

The color of a person's skin has no correlation to the beauty in their soul.

The opposite of fear is curiosity, courage, and love.

Let us ALL bravely be more curious and loving than we are afraid.